Just came back from Chia Jiesin's performance at the Esplanade. The performance was fantastic! AJC band and CO put up a stupendous work together. It would have been nearer to perfect if I wasn't given a ticket at the third circus which is horribly high. And given my chronic fear of heights. you can lol.
Been reading a couple of ppl's blogs lately, and the issue has reverted to the function of a blog. It's really ironic that blog users don't know what they're doing, and question the very necessity for having a blog. There are some people who (surprisingly) rant about how there's nothing worth blogging (and then they continue for ages about how life sucks which is a blogging). Then there are those that complain about how they're robbed of their freedom of speech nowadays. Maybe we oughta explore this issue รข la Craig.
I just know the blog is a WEBlog. A log is something you use to record data in chronological form. So doesn't this imply then that it is more like a diary? But then a diary-writer will have the tendency to spill his emotions and thoughts into his writings. This then also implies that diaries are a tool for the expression of one's thoughts. Elementary, this may seem. The tricky part comes when we need to know where our thoughts should be exposed and when not.
My take on freedom of speech? Go and say what you want at all! It's not wrong. Freedom of speech itself is a right given to us. But if we look more closely into this pervasive problem of blog scandals, then maybe we need to examine what 'speech' is presented for all public to see. In the first place, is it for the public to be seen?
If we have assumed already that a blog is a diary, then we must accept the fact that blogs retain the privacy and secrecy that a diary traditionally has. The only variable that's been changed in the blog is the element of privacy. It's no longer yours to keep. The world knows what you think. Then doesn't this irk you? You become a transparent being, waiting to be scruntinised by public. Thoughts are no longer sacred. They aren't given space to develop further through meditation. For once a person has blogged, it's quite unlikely they'll go back and read their recent previous posts. At least I don't. So we get extremely raw and unprocessed thought. The value of thought is undermined.
Now that the value of thought has been reduced, what quality do we see? Those of rage, prejudice and bitterness? Like those of racist nature that got the A* scholar in so much trouble? Or that of NS men being whiny? Sure, these pinpointed controversies may be comments that are made out of impulse, but not all are like that. Some are made in total bloodthirst. Intentional attacks. They indicate that the personality of the blogger is one that has been shaped to hate. Personally, I don't trust thoughts from a soul like that. Many of these people have no idea why they hate. Have they really meditated on why they do so? Why do they have a need to abuse their freedom of speech to declare their abhorrence for a particular person or thing? Their thoughts are not ripe....
The sin is that the blog is being abused as a medium for exercising freedom of speech. And so I shall use mine to exercise mine.
I certainly don't care what people say because they are they. I am I. Freedom of speech has already given them a legitimate means of justifying their actions. In fact, I don't think the law will make any progress in it's divine mission by punishing those who slander, be it in life or on blogs. Principals and the ministry have the duty of moulding (not 'mould'-ing) our minds into 'future leaders of tomorrow' and whatnot, but the fact is, their responsibility is to make sure that morally and in terms of maturity, we grow up the right way. So I agree that the scholars and students deserve punishment for their scathing remarks. As for those who are under no such wing, they deserve to say what they want. All they will be is just another reminder to us that humanity plunges to waste and self-destruction. How people will use the media to achieve fame, and they use that fame to destroy others, and create more war than there already is. That's all it ends in: destruction.
Why does the law go after us? Essentially, communication of any means is a form of transmitting ideas. This will inadvertently influence other people who participate in the form of communication. We may think that our remarks do not brainwash people, but naturally, people who may read our blogs will agree. Either some people will believe what we say and join in our retaliant ways, or some other people will agree with us and push things to another level, something far worse. OUR WORDS HAVE THE POWER TO INFLUENCE.
A right is not just given to us, it is entrusted in us. It is a responsibility. Cliche. But it means more to me now. I don't want to abuse that right. That is why I ensure that I do not consciously slander any particular person or instituion or whatsoever.
And someone else mentioned that a good blogger must be witty and have snide remarks. I don't believe in entertainment. It can be totally defiling at times. Sure we get a good laugh but our thoughts can be shaped against the person the remarks were intended for. It's not true that sharing personal thoughts is a sign of weakness. Recognising one's weakness is strength in itself. I feel I am more accountable to people who read my blog, because the public is watching out for my actions. There was this saying by this ol' chinese warrior guy, I just can't seem to rmb how it goes. I think it's something like, hide your strengths and expose your weakness. Ironic it seems, but it's like defense is your best offense. I think I floppped in this part.
Anyhow, as for me, my blog will be a site where my friends will know more about my weaknesses. I want people to know I'm not invincible and I need care as much as I want to care. My blog will be a site where my foes are uncertain of my strengths, for they will only be absorbed in my weaknesses. By then, they would've been transformed into strength.
For now, you chose the way you run your blog, and I'll choose the way I run mine. My thoughts may be meaningless and petty to you. But they are precious to me.